InstantForum.NET v4.1.4Gambling.com Forumhttp://www.gambling.com/forum/forums@gambling.comThu, 08 Jan 2009 18:42:33 GMT20http://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic7665-15-1.aspxYes, especially if its one that hasn't quite worked out all the bugs yet! They kill me!Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:42:52 GMTChipsAlivehttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic7665-15-1.aspxYou are right and there are many "flashy" sites out there sometimes though you can see have a hassle with dealings of a new site that just started up, those are always a pain.Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:45:45 GMTredneckhttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic7665-15-1.aspxI can imagine-certainly dynamic sites are fancier and generally have better functionality. But still, not everyone has a machine that is capable of handling the dynamic stuff.Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:24:18 GMTChipsAlivehttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic7665-15-1.aspxThat might depend, I have still seen some sites that are all HTML but the code is so nasty it just makes me look elsewhere.Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:24:54 GMTrawrmoo42http://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic7665-15-1.aspxAre there any casinos still that are HTML only? I realise that they would be a bit limited, but the load time should be way better shouldn't it?Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:39:11 GMTChipsAlive