InstantForum.NET v4.1.4Gambling.com Forumhttp://www.gambling.com/forum/forums@gambling.comFri, 21 Nov 2008 03:15:11 GMT20http://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic6449-34-1.aspxI think it is smart business not to release him. This way they get a chance to at least get a player or two and/or possibly some decent draft picks. Why let him just walk away and turn his back on the team he played all of those years with? If I were a team shopping for a QB I'd pass him up. I wonder why it is that all of a sudden he has the "drive to play" back?Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:26:00 GMTBig Slimhttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic6449-34-1.aspxIt does seem to be a rather immature game they are playing. One day he wants to quit, then he doesn't then he wants a different team. What does he expect the Packer's coaches to do, play tiddlywinks until he decides and hope its before the first game? I think they should go ahead with bringing him back but "not as a starter" as they have said.Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:11:27 GMTMickeyhttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic6449-34-1.aspxWell.. Brett may want his papers but according to Ted Thompson.. He ain't getting em. The Packers have officially declined to allow Brett to enter Free Agency. They have said that they will welcome him back but, most likely not as the starter.Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:05:37 GMT5linepayouthttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic6449-34-1.aspxI say let him go. Brett is the big man but he's not bigger than the game or the organisation, for that matter. I think the Packers need to look at the bigger picture and start honing new talentSat, 12 Jul 2008 18:19:39 GMTcockdicehttp://www.gambling.com/forum/Topic6449-34-1.aspxBrett Favre has been discussing with the Packers a return to football this fall. Apparently they aren't too thrilled with the idea. So he is now seeking to get out of his contract so he can play for a different team. What are your thoughts about this new development?Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:21:32 GMTMickey